The gap between AI ambition and AI readiness costs enterprises millions in failed implementations. Without a structured assessment, organizations buy tools nobody uses, deploy AI without data readiness, and waste budget on misaligned initiatives. Understanding where you stand is the first step toward meaningful transformation.
85%
of AI projects fail without proper readiness assessment
Organizations that skip structured evaluation consistently underperform on AI initiatives.
$4.6M
Average cost of a failed AI initiative
Failed implementations waste budget, erode team trust, and delay meaningful transformation.
3–4x
Higher success rate with structured assessment
Organizations that conduct readiness audits before implementing report dramatically better outcomes.
4–12
Weeks from kickoff to complete Possibilities Report
Timeline depends on organization size, number of departments, and complexity of existing systems.
If your teams are saying things like these, it is time for a structured evaluation rather than a technology purchase.
“We know AI is important but we do not know where to start.”
Chief Technology Officer
“Our team is stretched thin. There has to be a better way.”
Chief Operating Officer
“We have manual processes everywhere but do not know what to automate first.”
VP of Operations
“We want to adopt AI but need someone to tell us what makes sense for us.”
Chief Executive Officer
“We have tools but they do not talk to each other.”
IT Director
“Everyone is talking about AI but we do not know what applies to us.”
Chief Marketing Officer
To assess AI readiness accurately, we need visibility into your current operations, technology stack, and business goals.
A clear picture of what you are trying to achieve — cost reduction, faster delivery, better customer experience, or new revenue streams.
An overview of your platforms, tools, integrations, and data infrastructure so we can identify where AI fits naturally.
Who does what, how decisions get made, and which workflows consume the most time or produce the most errors.
We evaluate processes across the entire organization — not just the obvious departments. Every team has hidden opportunities for AI.
Our structured process takes 4 to 12 weeks depending on organization size, delivering actionable insights at every stage.
Identify departments, assign key contacts from each team, schedule video calls, and request system access.
Conduct video calls with each department. Walk through processes, identify bottlenecks, review tools, and document findings.
Assess project management tools, CRM workflows, marketing automation, documentation practices, and integration gaps.
Analyze findings across all departments, identify AI opportunities, prioritize by impact, and create the Possibilities Report.
Present findings to the leadership team, walk through each recommendation, answer questions, and deliver full documentation.
Provide a phased implementation plan with detailed quotes for each recommended AI solution, timelines, and expected ROI.
A comprehensive document that covers every finding, every opportunity, and every recommendation — ranked by impact and effort. This is your roadmap to AI implementation.
Based on audit findings, we identify which of these solutions address each department’s specific challenges — and in what order.
Automate repetitive tasks, data entry, notification routing, and approval chains across departments. The most commonly recommended solution.
Most RecommendedCentralize scattered documentation and eliminate the same questions being asked repeatedly across teams. High impact, fast deployment.
Quick WinIntelligent automation for specific tasks like lead scoring, content drafting, research, and data analysis. Advanced but transformative.
AdvancedConsolidate data from multiple systems into unified reporting with AI-generated insights and anomaly detection.
Data & ReportingAdd AI capabilities to existing software without replacing systems your teams already rely on. Infrastructure-level improvement.
InfrastructureIntelligent customer support, FAQ handling, and lead qualification available around the clock. Customer-facing AI that works immediately.
Customer-FacingOrganizations that complete the audit and implement recommendations typically see measurable improvements within 90 days.
Every organization has a different starting point. We scope the audit based on complexity, team size, and the number of workflows to evaluate.
In Practice
Every AI readiness assessment starts with the same question: where will AI create the most value for the least disruption? Here are three answers.
The problem: A regional bank with 14 branches knew AI could improve operations but did not know where to start. Every vendor pitched a different solution — chatbots, fraud detection, document processing, credit scoring. The CTO needed an objective assessment before committing budget.
What we assessed: Evaluated 8 departments across 42 processes. Scored each for AI readiness based on data availability, process standardization, and potential ROI. Identified document processing in the mortgage department as the highest-impact, lowest-risk starting point — high volume, structured data, clear success metrics.
The outcome: The bank implemented mortgage document processing AI first, reducing processing time by 60%. The clear ROI from the first project unlocked budget for two additional AI initiatives. The assessment roadmap guided AI investments for the next 18 months — with measurable milestones at each stage.
The problem: A manufacturing company with 3 plants and 800 employees had leadership pressure to “adopt AI” but no clarity on which processes would benefit. The operations team was skeptical — they had seen failed technology rollouts before and did not want another system nobody used.
What we assessed: Conducted on-site evaluations at all 3 plants. Mapped 56 operational processes. Found that predictive maintenance for CNC machines had the best combination of available sensor data, clear downtime costs ($4,800 per incident), and straightforward implementation. Quality inspection ranked second.
The outcome: Predictive maintenance was implemented in 10 weeks. Unplanned downtime decreased 40% within 6 months. The operations team — initially skeptical — became the strongest advocates for the quality inspection phase. The assessment gave leadership a defensible, data-backed AI strategy instead of vendor-driven impulse purchases.
The problem: A 200-person consulting firm wanted to use AI across the organization — proposal writing, research, client reporting, knowledge management, and billing. Partners disagreed on priorities. Some wanted AI writing tools immediately. Others wanted knowledge management first. Nobody had data to settle the debate.
What we assessed: Interviewed 30 team members across 6 departments. Quantified time spent on each process. Found that proposal generation consumed 2,400 hours per year firm-wide, with a 28% win rate. Knowledge management inefficiency cost an estimated 1,800 hours per year in duplicate research. Proposal AI had faster ROI; knowledge base had larger long-term impact.
The outcome: The firm implemented proposal AI first (6-week project), followed by a knowledge base (12-week project). Proposal turnaround time dropped from 5 days to 1 day. Win rate increased to 34% with more consistent, data-backed proposals. The phased roadmap prevented the “do everything at once” approach that had derailed previous technology investments.
Stop guessing. Get a structured assessment that evaluates every department, every process, and every system — with specific, prioritized recommendations.
FAQ.